tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2469455714051866900.post8467378415757808112..comments2008-05-30T10:01:57.120+01:00Mr Hhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00693819250286976497noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2469455714051866900.post-39077144392830828862008-05-30T09:40:00.000+01:002008-05-30T09:40:00.000+01:00i would go for ranking by editors rather than readers, as reader-ranking that already exists on the internet tends to go for the funniest/weirdest/most-sex-related stories rather than the most important. it's not just news rating services, but even the bbc and the guardian have small boxes listing 'most read' and 'most emailed'. the stories listed in these boxes are never the same as the order of stories the site editors have chosen.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com